Wednesday, 26 July 2017

Edward’s Diary Entry 150: Aaaaa.... a sudden insight?

Now the root sound of all sounds is Aaaa, as in AUM. Not surprisingly, this is the first letter of the alphabet in most languages: A, aleph, alif, alpha, etc. When pronounced, this sound vibrates from a point just below the navel and spreads up throughout the body. We just open our mouths, gently, mouth relaxed, and press out a vowel sound using the diaphragm and out comes the basic sound Aaaa…(in picture, right). If we started gently closing our mouths with this sound, the next sound Uuuu comes out, and when we completely close our mouths, there is only the Mmmm sound left. These are the three basic sounds that we can make without using the tongue. In other words, even if you had no tongue, or your tongue were cut out, you could still say AUM.

When a dog or cat stretches and opens its mouth and then closes it, it also makes something like the sound AUM. Sheep start the sound production process before opening their mouths, and therefore use an explosive B in front of the Aaaa, when they baa. Cows prefer the M at the beginning, followed by the Uuuu and then maybe an Aaa, when they moo. So, the basic process of expelling air from a cavity of the body through a tube creates the Aaa sound, a universal sound, a primary resonance from the root of preceding silence. And therefore we can say that the root of the 3 root sounds is silence itself.

Now as I was pronouncing the “big inner question” about the “I”, I realised that the pronunciation of “I” in English is actually just an Aaaa followed by a tensing of the middle/front part of tongue upwards to end in “ee”, the diphthong [ai]. English has preserved, so to speak, the original Sanskrit “I”, “Aham”, and the root sound “Aaa” is common to both. “I” is “’ana” in Arabic as well. The root sound Aaa is common to the personal pronoun “I”. Why is this?

Look what happened to the scholar-poet Ganapati Muni in the early 20th C, brought to my attention in Facebook today:

”The Muni approached the Virupaksha Cave where Brahmanaswami lived on the 18th of November 1907. Prostrating before the young Sage, he pleaded with a trembling voice: "All that has to be read I have read. Even Vedanta Sastra I have fully understood. I have performed japa to my heart's content, yet I have not up to this time understood what tapas is. Hence, have I sought refuge at thy feet. Pray enlighten me about the nature of tapas."
For fifteen minutes Sri Ramana Maharshi silently gazed at the Muni. He then spoke:

"If one watches where the notion of 'I' springs, the mind will be absorbed into that. That is tapas.”

“If a mantra is repeated and attention is directed to the source where the mantra sound is produced, the mind will be absorbed into that. That is tapas."

Upon hearing these words of the sage, the scholar-poet was filled with joy and announced that this upadesa was entirely original and that Brahmanaswami was a Maharshi and should be so called thereafter. He then gave the name of Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi to Brahmanaswami, whose original name had been Venkataraman.

Now the “Who am I?”-question takes on a new significance. It is not just a thought in so many words. Now it becomes a sound. When walking, the “Who” and the “am” are two footsteps, say using the right foot, repeated silently, and then the “I” can become a long sounded “Aaaaaaiii” for 3 more footsteps. And since there is so much going on in the city streets, with pedestrians on cell phones and vehicles coursing through the streets, no one notices the soft vibrant sound as I walk along… And if they did, perhaps in Spanish they would just think I am complaining about something, as people do here, saying “aaaaayyyyy”, or “woe is me!”. But no, no complaints, just perseverance, that’s all.

Thursday, 20 July 2017

Edward’s Diary Entry 149: Off-the Cuff A-to-Z of Things We Have Overcome or Partly Overcome

Anxiety: a wrong use of the thinking function stimulating adrenaline over nothing.
Believing: a harmful non-recognition of not knowing.
Complaining: an adverse and harmful emotional reaction to a fact or reality.
Disliking: a dysfunctional emotional rejection to an Act of God (which can be anything or anyone).
Envy: the misconceived sense that you can have what someone else has worked for without working for it.
Fearing: an illogical feeling of stress derived from unconscious trauma reinforced by habitual thinking patterns.
Gossiping: talking behind people’s backs about things that in any case they can’t help doing or not doing.
Hating: an adverse and harmful emotional reaction stemming from exaggerated disliking.
Identifying: imbuing one’s entire sense of self in a mere idea, notion, belief, assumption or falsehood and then striving to justify it.
Joylessness: being a sourpuss and fretting all the time, instead of observing how joy wells up from inside.
Killing Time: meditation can be “dolce far niente” the sweet idleness of reaching inward, but just “killing time” by not sensing the marvels of the world is out. Time is occupied by inner work and exercises when socialising permits.
Loneliness: a feeling of missing others who you think should be with you even if you know you’re not worth being with because you can’t even stand yourself.
Me-Myself and I-ing: the misconceived act of thinking the whole world is only there for you, and you alone.
Negativity: the tendency to pay more attention to an apparent fault than to a potential virtue.
Opinionatedness: sticking to one’s opinion’s at all costs, with no reasonable analysis of the vast possibilities of declaring ignorance.
Pain when sitting cross-legged: Well, partly overcome, no cushions needed anymore, left leg on floor and right leg almost on floor, relaxation helps, and sitting sessions are sometimes 54-56 mins long. So that’s progress.
Quitting: becoming superficially interested in self-development and then stopping suddenly due to attendant circumstances… Lacking perseverance.
Resentment: a misplaced feeling of having been wronged, but there is nothing in the past that could have been otherwise so there is nothing to feel resentment about.
Susceptibility: an overly self-righteous ego open to bad feelings about being criticised.
Thanklessness: On the contrary, there is much to be thankful for.
Unexamined Life: although examination continues, at least a plan has been established.
Vanity: thinking your bathroom unit is the best in the world, and disregarding all others.
Whining: similar to G, above, but crying behind people’s backs about things that in any case they can’t help doing or not doing.
Xenophobising: fictitiously dividing people into distant GMS positions so you can have temper tantrums about them because you’re actually pissed off by someone geographically closer to you – or your own self!
Yesterday-ing: mental process of continually singing a McCartney song about how you were ditched at some time in the past as an excuse not to start living in the present.
Zombieism: process of living like a half-dead or three-quarters-dead semi-human, who neither thinks, emotes or contributes to human development, but just walks around drooling, looking for food and harming others.

Tuesday, 18 July 2017

Edward’s Diary Entry 148: Mind Circuitry

Where are the “on/off” switches? We are walking along the street. There is a rhythm to this, so the mind is given another rhythm to accompany it. On the in-breath there is a question, on the out-breath there is another question, and so it proceeds, somewhat in the background, somewhat to the fore. The thinking process dips into memory and brings up a recent subject. It plays with the idea and creates its own fantasy world in which the subject is dealt with – but that’s only imagination and quite useless. Memory churns up some more images and sensations from the past – also quite impractical and serving no purpose. A renewed inspiration places more awareness on the breathing process and the questions…

We observe the surroundings. The surroundings don’t help much – in fact, they distract, as thoughts arise and fuel more thoughts. These are comparative thoughts, and somewhat useful in that they question why we only see the outside or the physical and how can we see from the inside, or something similar, or recognise our shared essential humanity, and the like, but too much of this takes awareness away from breathing, and so we are back in that.

The on/off switch for identification with our own processes – thinking, feeling and holding opinions of our self – is pretty well established. The underlying will or deciding capacity is there for this, because identification or attachment is the most superficial activity of the mind: accretions from society, parents, peers… In other words, we are not totally immersed in our own psychological or mental processes that we can’t see the tricks played by the mind in this respect. The typical tricks include problems with self-esteem, self-worth, self-importance, fragile egos looking for attention, like the dog on a leash softly whining this morning at me, and asking for a little petting – hesitant at first, and then liking it more and more. Thoughts like “how could this have happened to me!” “how dare they talk about me that way!” “they are always putting me down, laughing at me, criticising me – I’ll show ‘em, they’re the stupid ones, that’s what they are!” And so on. This no longer happens to Edward Wells, as he stands a little above this, with a modicum of tranquillity in this respect.

But where is the on/off switch for memory? Sometimes the “on” switch works quite well. When talking about the past, Edward sometimes has surprising capacities for recall: the name of the eye doctor at 11 years of age; the name or lyrics of the song that coincides with someone’s sudden thought; answers to questions from the elderly who can no longer remember things that happened 45 years ago or more… but at other times, other people show more prowess in this field, don’t they, my love? The “off” switch for occasional reminiscences seems simply to be disregarding images popping into the field of awareness by using awareness or placing attention on other processes of a more vital kind, like moving legs, breathing in and out, or looking up at the sky from a city street to appreciate a cloud formation, which not many people seem interested in doing. These picturings and fictitious role-plays simply fade away with renewed attention, or a simple thought like “back to the present, my boy!” But still, the memory process lurks in the background ready to jump up and call for attention at any moment, particularly if there is a candescent life situation that is currently of interest. There is no sure-fire way to either switch it on or switch it off. Awareness of immediate physical processes like breathing seems to be the only way. Maybe that's because breath goes beyond mere oxygenation to connect us with the entire world...

Now what about the on/off switch for emotions? A-ha! This is pretty easy for Edward. Because there is a pervading emotional background anyway which needs no special disturbing – it is calm, peaceful enjoyment, sometimes increasing to delight and joy, sometimes just remaining in a sort of dwell phase of mild pleasantness. This is due to a thinking process that is also quite orderly, for without a well-established thinking capacity, emotions can sway completely out of control at any moment depending on circumstances. And the student of the mind does not want this. We are looking for what is behind the body and behind the mind – inside the psyche so to speak, pushing it, fuelling it, making it tick. What is it that makes the mind tick? Where does this “I”-thought come from? How is it powered? Whence does it come? There is this seat of decision making and will somewhere there in the background, and it has nothing to do with what is being thought, felt, dredged up from memory or used as a source of attachment or identification or imbued with a sensation of egoistic self-worth. It is something else, not this. So, as thoughts basically revolve around a clear idea of what is higher nature and what is lower nature, what is virtuous or not, what is sattvic and what is rajic, what is karma and what is akarma and vikarma, good action or bad, what leads to increased awareness or what doesn’t, the thinking process is not such a problem anymore. When it is seen that thinking wants to travel its own way – the way of the world, physicality and feelings – the superficial thinking mind can be given an exercise to do, simply repeating its mantra-questions or being forced to turn its thoughts inward to seek the source of the process itself. And all other “automatic concerns”, let’s call them, fade away. Give a dog a bone and it’ll chew – that’s the truism and it works for vagrant minds. Viz Thoreau, who said, “Do what you love. Know your own bone; gnaw at it, bury it, unearth it, and gnaw it still.”

The higher faculty of thinking is purposeful thinking – thinking about real things, ourselves, the world and its people and their problems – and striving to come to a logical solution for these things. Useless thinking, and wasteful expenditure of air, is called “gossiping”, of which there is much. Purposeful, dedicated thinking about one’s self, one’s life, about meaning, and even one’s purpose in life, is what I call higher thinking. And this is something I mostly do on my own, for lack of appropriate company, unfortunately! Or indulge in on this blog for my own benefit and possibly that of others….

In any case, the process continues and Edward offers himself as a true and faithful guinea pig of the mind. And, one day, we will see what comes of all this… hopefully.

Monday, 10 July 2017